|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Packaging engineers face a confusing array of variables when selecting moisture adsorbents partly because moisture control is a multi-faceted challenge. There are four sources of water contamination in a closed container or package: the water vapor in the air inside the package; the water vapor adsorbed by the materials inside the package; the water vapor on the walls of the package; and the permeation of water vapor into the package. Historically, desiccants are chosen by application-testing, commonly known as trial and error. Formal testing can become quite costly in time and money, and the purpose of this article is to provide basic information about currently available desiccants and their properties. It will help the packaging engineer to make better informed selections, and reduce the number of variables that must be addressed in desiccant testing. These variables can be classified into two main groups: those pertaining to the product, its package and its environment; and the various properties of commercially available desiccants. Through first-hand testing and published research, the packaging engineer determines the conditions surrounding optimum product preservation and performance. In attempting to meet and maintain these conditions, one often encounters moisture and its accompanying hazards: corrosion, rust, mold, mildew, fungus, swelling, and other undesirable factors affecting product integrity. Where can one turn for answers? Based upon its wartime experience in the development of food and drug drying agents, the U.S. Department of Defense developed specifications addressing the elimination of corrosion and mildew by adsorbing the moisture from the air of an enclosed space. In November 1963, the DOD released MIL-D-3464C, covering the use of bagged desiccants for packaging and static dehumidification. Currently, MIL-D-3464E serves to update the original specification, creating a uniform standard of comparison in a wide variety of areas: adsorption capacity and rate, dusting characteristics of the package, strength and corrosiveness of the package, and particle size of the desiccant. In 1973, the DOD followed with specifications for cleaning, drying, preserving, and packaging of items, equipment and materials for protection against corrosion, mechanical and physical damage, and other forms of deterioration under MIL-P-116. MIL-D-3464 and MIL-P-116 have long been the only objective source for packaging engineers. The strength of these specs lies in determining a uniform unit of drying capacity, enabling one to compare desiccant effectiveness on a common scale. The specifications, however, fail to deal specifically with variables, such as product environment, packaging of the product itself, and the type of desiccant suitable for a specific need. Also, other important factors are defined but not applied: desiccant packaging form, cover stock, adsorption rate, and adsorption capacity. These specifications seem only to compare the conformance of the desiccant selected to Defense Department standards. As a result, the packaging engineer may be at a loss to choose with confidence which particular desiccant is best for each application. Thus, the engineer must move outside the limited scope of military specifications and into the real world of moisture-proof packaging: the product’s environment and package. Environment Adsorbent Selection Process By comparing the properties and capabilities
of each desiccant product, the engineer can identify the correct desiccant
and make a clear choice. Silica Gel (SiO2 * H2O) Molecular Sieve (Synthetic Zeolite
- Na12Al03SiO2 12XH2O) Calcium Oxide (CaO) For flexible containers: units of desiccant required = 1.6 x A (in ft2) of 0.001 x A (in2) where A = the area of the barrier in2 or ft2. For rigid containers: units of desiccant required = K x V, where K = 0.161 (in gal.) or 0.0007 (in3) or 1.2 (ft3) and V = the volume within the barrier (in gal., in3 or ft3). Calculation: To determine the amount of desiccant required: (1) Identify the type of container. Is it a flexible barrier type (foil or poly bag), or is it a rigid type (drum or pail)? (2) Calculate the size of the container
in ft2 or in2 of
the container walls if it is flexible; in gal., ft3 or
in3, if it is rigid. (4) Select the type of desiccant that meets your needs according to Figures 1 and 2. In calculating the number of desiccant units required, dunnage (interior packing, cushioning, blocking, and bracing materials) must be considered. Cover Stock: An important factor in the efficiency of the selected desiccant is the bag material (cover stock) of the desiccant. The cover stock must allow the desiccant to do its job without harming the product. This means maintaining an acceptable adsorption rate and conforming to the product's dusting requirements. The selected desiccant's adsorption rate is greatly affected by the water vapor transmission rate of its cover stock. This is the measure of the gain or loss of water vapor through the package of the bagged desiccant. By their nature, certain products, require a very non-dusting desiccant bag to maintain their integrity. While dealing with dusting requirements, however, the packaging engineer encounters another problem: in preventing the release of dust into the container, the water vapor transmission rate is often adversely affected. The search for a solution has led to the development of a spunbonded, high-density, polyethylene material known commercially as Tyvek®. Created by DuPont, Tyvek resembles a waxy paper with good whiteness and exceptional strength, maintaining its size and shape with changes in humidity. It will not allow dust to be released into the container, is resistant to staining, mold, and mildew growth, and will not reduce the adsorption rate of the desiccant it holds. Because of its special properties, Tyvek is more expensive than conventional desiccant package materials. When Tyvek is sealed with thermoplastic lamination (requiring heat and pressure), it will lose part of its permeability. Süd-Chemie Performance Packaging has a process that will heat-seal the bag by joining Tyvek directly to Tyvek with no adverse effect on the adsorption rate. It should be noted that some desiccant products have a specialized function. For example, activated alumina (a very porous desiccant) is extremely effective for drying gases. Activated carbon has been used extensively for many years as an adsorbent of odors and toxic gasses - it has long been used in military gas masks. Others, ranging from metal salts to phosphorus compounds, have specific strengths that would be impossible to address individually. Often it is left up to the desiccant supplier to answer the packaging engineer's specific questions. If you have any questions or would like more information, please call one of our Desiccant Specialists at 1-800-995-5590. You can also email our sales staff using the Contact Us form.
For more information,
contact us at:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||